Recorded violations per inspection
- This provider
- 0.89
- Local median
- 0.81
TLE AT DAVENPORT, LLC
45690 Highway 27, Davenport, FL 33897
- License:
- C10PO0476
- Type:
- Child Care Facility
- Status:
- Licensed
- Records checked:
- July 12, 2026
Additional info
- Programs and services:
- School Readiness, VPK, Food Served, Full Day, Half Day, Infant Care
- Hours:
- Mon-Fri: 6:30AM to 6:30PM; Sat-Sun: Closed
- Capacity:
- 173
- License expiration:
- December 5, 2026
Typical cost: $1,127 - $1,157 (Under 1)
Child’s age
$1,127 - $1,157/mo
Median daily rate: $52.00 - $53.40
Official Florida Division of Early Learning Polk County data.
Not this provider’s price.
Inspection snapshot
Questions worth asking
The available records raise questions worth asking before enrolling.
Next: Review the inspection history below and ask the provider what the records mean and what changed afterward.
Latest inspectionApril 1, 2026
Latest inspection with no recorded violationsApril 1, 2026
Summary
This summary covers nine available inspections for TLE AT DAVENPORT, LLC from November 13, 2024 through April 1, 2026.
Two inspections recorded violations, with eight recorded violations in total.
The most recent recorded violation was on July 14, 2025 and involved administrative posting, with a due date of December 31, 2025.
Background screening was a higher-concern topic that showed up in one inspection.
Four later inspections, from August 5, 2025 through April 1, 2026, showed no recorded violations, but the records do not say whether they were formal follow-ups.
At a glance
- Total inspections
- 9
- Recorded violations
- 8
- Higher-concern violations
- 2
- Repeated topics
- 1
5 in last 12 months
1 in last 12 months
0 in last 12 months
Last 36 months
Local comparison
9 total inspections vs 9.5 local median in 33897
Compared to 10 local facilities
Inspections with higher-concern violations
- This provider
- 11%
- Local median
- 11%
Inspections with recorded violations
- This provider
- 22%
- Local median
- 23%
Repeated topics
- This provider
- 1
- Local average
- 1.7
Repeated topics
Topics that appeared in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. They may reveal a pattern worth examining.
Administrative posting
Appeared across 2 inspections, with 2 recorded violations.
March 26, 2025July 14, 2025Inspection history
Available inspection history. Select a violation topic for more info.
No recorded violations in this report
No recorded violations in this report
No recorded violations in this report
No recorded violations in this report
Low concern: Administrative posting
- Report finding
- The facility failed to include their license number when advertising. s.402.318, F.S.
- Report comments
- At the time of the complaint inspection, the marque sign displaying the name of the facility did not contain the license number or the business cards for the directors. It was advised to ensure that the license number is included when the business name is used to maintain compliance of this standard.
- Correction status
- Due by December 31, 2025
More details
- Report section
- GENERAL REQUIREMENTS - 01 - License Displayed/Citation Posted/Advertising
- Official code
- 01-03
No recorded violations in this report
No recorded violations in this report
Low concern: Administrative posting
- Report finding
- The facility failed to post the room capacity in each room. CCF Handbook, Section 3.4.1, A Physical Environment [SR]
- Inspector notes
- At the time of inspection, the Licensing specialist observed the capacitys were not posted in any room. At the last inspection the provider was provided with capacitys after measuring the facility, the provider failed to post capacitys. The specialist asked the provider to post the capacities for each room at time of inspection. TA was provided to ensure that the room capacity is posted at all times.
- Correction status
- Completed at time of inspection
More details
- Report section
- PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT - 15 - Licensed Capacity
- Official code
- 15-05
Medium concern: Staff training
- Report finding
- The facility did not have documentation to show child care personnel had begun the introductory training within 90 days of employment in the child care industry. CCF Handbook, Section 4.1
- Report comments
- At the time of inspection, the Licensing specialist determined that the child care personnel listed on the supplemental did not start an introductory course within 90 days of work in the industry. The staff started in the industry on 9/4/2024 but did not start a course until 12/19/ 2024. The staff started a course, but it was late. TA was provided to ensure that child care personnel start a required DCF course within 90 days of employment in the child care industry. TS was provided to ensure that child care personnel start a DCF introductory Training course within 90 days of employment in the industry. Courses started prior to industry start date are not applicable for compli ... [truncated]
- Correction status
- Completed at time of inspection
More details
- Report section
- TRAINING - 33 - Training Requirements
- Official code
- 33-03
Medium concern: Health or food records
- Report finding
- The Florida Certificate of immunization was not acceptable in that: [ The form was not current (expired)]. CCF Handbook, Section 7.1 Record Keeping [SR]
- Report comments
- At the time of inspection, the Licensing specialist determined that the children listed on the supplemental had expired Immunization records. Child 1s form was expired as of 12/24/2024. Child 2s form was expired as of 12/31/2024. Child 3s form was also expired as of 12/31/2024. TA was provided to ensure that the children listed on the supplemental have current Immunization records on file for Licensing to review by the due date. TS was provided to ensure the provider is encouraging parents to receive an amended Immunization records when the form has a documented date for K-12 complete or to include 7 th grade Immunizations complete that are not applicable to the age of the ch ... [truncated]
- Correction status
- Due by April 25, 2025
More details
- Report section
- RECORD KEEPING - 41 - Immunization Records
- Official code
- 41-02
Medium concern: Health or food records
- Report finding
- Child(ren) did not have a Student Health Examination/DH (Form 3040), or an equivalent health statement on file within 30 days of enrollment. CCF Handbook, Section 7.2, C Record Keeping [SR]
- Report comments
- At the time of inspection, the Licensing specialist determined that the child listed on the supplemental did not have a medical physical on file for Licensing to review. TA was provided to ensure that the child has a current medical physical on file by the due date.
- Correction status
- Due by April 25, 2025
More details
- Report section
- RECORD KEEPING - 42 - Student Health and Records
- Official code
- 42-01
Medium concern: Health or food records
- Report finding
- The Student Health Examination or equivalent health statement was not acceptable in that: [ It was not current (over two years old)]. CCF Handbook, Section 7.2 Record Keeping [SR]
- Report comments
- At the time of inspection, the Licensing specialist determined that the child listed on the supplemental had a medical physical expired as of 2/13/2023. The form is valid for two years and expired on 2/13/2025. The provider immediately reached out to the childs parents and the parent emailed an updated medical physical at time of inspection. The updated form is dated 2/18/2025. The form was expired and the provider just received a current copy on todays date. TA was provided to ensure that children have current medical physicals on file for Licensing to review.
- Correction status
- Completed at time of inspection
More details
- Report section
- RECORD KEEPING - 42 - Student Health and Records
- Official code
- 42-02
Higher concern: Background screening
- Report finding
- An employment history verification was not documented and on file. CCF Handbook, Section 5.1, D Record Keeping [SR]
- Inspector notes
- At the time of inspection, the Licensing specialist determined that the child care personnel listed on the supplemental, the provider failed to verify all previous work history within the past five years. The specialist observed employment on the staffs background screening past history and observed that work history was not verified. The specialist advised that the provider verify employment. The provider verified employment not previously documented at time of inspection and documented on file for Licensing to review. TA was provided to ensure that all previous work history is verified and documented on file prior to staff starting at the facility.
- Correction status
- Completed at time of inspection
More details
- Report section
- RECORD KEEPING - 45 - Background Screening Documents
- Official code
- 45-04
Higher concern: Background screening
- Report finding
- Child care personnels Level 2 documentation was incomplete in that [ A copy of out-of-state child abuse and neglect registry search is missing., A copy of out-of-state sexual offender/predator registry search is missing.]. CCF Handbook, Section 7.4.1, D, E, and F Record Keeping [SR]
- Report comments
- At the time of inspection, the Licensing specialist determined that the child care personnel listed on the supplemental, the provider failed to initiate out of state search required for sexual offender search and child abuse and neglect registry. The staff previously lived in Illinois within the past 5 years. The provider initiated a sexual offender search for the state of Illinois at time of inspection. TA was provided to ensure that the provider initiates an out of state search for sexual offender search and child abuse and neglect registry and documents results on file by the due date.
- Correction status
- Due by April 25, 2025
More details
- Report section
- RECORD KEEPING - 45 - Background Screening Documents
- Official code
- 45-11
No recorded violations in this report
Questions to ask
Suggested questions for parents based on recorded violations in inspection reports. If there are not enough source-backed violations, you will see general questions for daycare.
Finding-specific
What is your current process for ensuring that all staff background screening documentation is complete and up to date?
Why ask this
- Why ask this
- An official inspection report from 2025 noted instances where required background screening documentation, such as out-of-state registry searches, was missing for personnel. Asking about the current process helps families understand how the center manages these important records.
Related violations
Finding-specific
Could you walk me through how you verify and maintain employment history for new staff members?
Why ask this
- Why ask this
- Public records from an inspection indicate that employment history verification was previously missing for some staff. This question allows the provider to explain the steps taken to ensure all staff credentials and histories are properly documented.
Related violations
Finding-specific
What system do you use to track and update student health and immunization records to ensure they remain current?
Why ask this
- Why ask this
- Available inspection records from 2025 identified that some student health and immunization forms were expired or missing at the time of the visit. Understanding the tracking system helps parents feel confident that their child's health records are monitored consistently.
Related violations
Finding-specific
How do you support new staff members in completing their required introductory training courses within the necessary timeframe?
Why ask this
- Why ask this
- An inspection report noted that documentation for introductory training for a staff member was not completed within the required 90-day window. Asking about this process helps families understand how the center prioritizes and tracks staff professional development.
Related violations
Finding-specific
How do you ensure that all required administrative information, such as room capacities and license numbers, remains clearly posted?
Why ask this
- Why ask this
- Public records show that administrative posting requirements, including room capacities and license numbers in advertising, were noted in more than one inspection. This question provides an opportunity to discuss how the center maintains these standards on an ongoing basis.
Related violations