At least one higher-concern violation appears in the last 12 months.
Next: Read reports, examine repeated topics below, look at the broader history, and ask what changed afterward.
Latest inspectionJuly 15, 2026
Latest inspection with no recorded violationsMay 6, 2026
Summary
This summary covers eight available inspections for BING NURSERY SCHOOL from December 15, 2022 through July 15, 2026.
Two inspections recorded violations, with two recorded violations in total.
The most recent higher-concern violation was on July 15, 2026 and involved supervision, with a due date of July 24, 2026.
The available reports do not include a later inspection with no recorded violations after that violation.
At a glance
Total inspections
8
4 in last 12 months
Recorded violations
2
1 in last 12 months
Higher-concern violations
1
1 in last 12 months
Repeated topics
0
Last 36 months
Local comparison
8 total inspections vs 6 local median in 94305
Compared to 12 local facilities
Recorded violations per inspection
This provider
0.25
Local median
0.33
0.25This provider
0.33Local median
Inspections with higher-concern violations
This provider
13%
Local median
6%
13%This provider
6%Local median
Inspections with recorded violations
This provider
25%
Local median
33%
25%This provider
33%Local median
Repeated topics
This provider
0
Local average
0.08
0This provider
0.08Local average
Repeated topics
Topics that appeared in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. They may reveal a pattern worth examining.
No repeated topics found
The available reports do not show the same violation topic appearing in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. Review the inspection history below for one-time violations or report details.
Inspection history
Available inspection history. Select a violation topic for more info.
CCR 101229(a)(1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time, except as specified in Sections 101216.2(e)(1) and 101230(c)(1). Supervision shall include visual observation. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one child had allegedly sustained an injury that required medical attention due to lack of adequate supervision, which poses an immediate health, safety, and/or personal rights risk to persons in care.
101700.3(b)(1) Lead Testing Written Directive- A result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, facility has 1 outlet of water test 5.5 ppb or greater, which is a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.
Report comments
This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, facility has 1 outlet of water test 5.5 ppb or greater, which is a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.