At least one higher-concern violation appears in the last 12 months.
Next: Read reports, examine repeated topics below, look at the broader history, and ask what changed afterward.
Latest inspectionMay 29, 2026
Latest inspection with no recorded violationsMay 29, 2026
Summary
This summary covers seven available inspections for SHU ACADEMY from September 2, 2021 through May 29, 2026.
One inspection recorded a violation, with two recorded violations in total.
The most recent higher-concern violation was on May 19, 2026 and involved sleep safety, with a due date of May 22, 2026.
A later inspection showed no recorded violations, but the records do not say whether it was a formal follow-up.
At a glance
Total inspections
7
2 in last 12 months
Recorded violations
2
2 in last 12 months
Higher-concern violations
2
2 in last 12 months
Repeated topics
0
Last 36 months
Local comparison
7 total inspections vs 4 local median in 94401
Compared to 16 local facilities
Recorded violations per inspection
This provider
0.29
Local median
0.16
0.29This provider
0.16Local median
Inspections with higher-concern violations
This provider
14%
Local median
0%
14%This provider
0%Local median
Inspections with recorded violations
This provider
14%
Local median
13%
14%This provider
13%Local median
Repeated topics
This provider
0
Local average
0
0This provider
0Local average
Repeated topics
Topics that appeared in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. They may reveal a pattern worth examining.
No repeated topics found
The available reports do not show the same violation topic appearing in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. Review the inspection history below for one-time violations or report details.
Inspection history
Available inspection history. Select a violation topic for more info.
101216.3: Teacher-Child Ratio: " (a) There shall be a ratio of one teacher visually observing and supervising no more than 12 children in attendance..." This requirement is not being met as evidence by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not comply with the section cited above as when LPA was conducting physical plant inspection, there was one staff with 22 children and then one staff with 15 children which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Report comments
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not comply with the section cited above as when LPA was conducting physical plant inspection, there was one staff with 22 children and then one staff with 15 children which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Correction status
Plan of correction due by May 22, 2026
More details
Official CA class
Type B deficiency
Report section
CCR 101216.3(a) - 101216.3(a)
Official code
101216.3(a)
Higher concern: Sleep safety
Report finding
101223: Personal Rights: " (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs." This requirement is not being met as evidence by: Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed a child dozing off in a chair that is not appropriate equipment to sleep and a staff (S2) sitting on top of child's cot with a child in arms which is not safe. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Inspector notes
Based on observation, the facility did not comply with the section cited above as LPA observed a child dozing off in a chair that is not appropriate equipment to sleep and a staff (S2) sitting on top of child's cot with a child in arms which is not safe. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.