The available records raise questions worth asking before enrolling.
Next: Review the inspection history below and ask the provider what the records mean and what changed afterward.
Latest inspectionJune 25, 2026
Latest inspection with no recorded violationsJune 25, 2026
Summary
This summary covers 10 available inspections for ESCONDIDO COMMUNITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC from August 23, 2022 through June 25, 2026.
Four inspections recorded violations, with four recorded violations in total.
The most recent recorded violation was on May 22, 2026 and involved facility condition, with a due date of May 29, 2026.
Supervision was a higher-concern topic that showed up in one inspection.
A later inspection showed no recorded violations, but the records do not say whether it was a formal follow-up.
At a glance
Total inspections
10
3 in last 12 months
Recorded violations
4
1 in last 12 months
Higher-concern violations
2
0 in last 12 months
Repeated topics
0
Last 36 months
Local comparison
10 total inspections vs 5 local median in 92025
Compared to 17 local facilities
Recorded violations per inspection
This provider
0.4
Local median
0.4
0.4This provider
0.4Local median
Inspections with higher-concern violations
This provider
20%
Local median
17%
20%This provider
17%Local median
Inspections with recorded violations
This provider
40%
Local median
20%
40%This provider
20%Local median
Repeated topics
This provider
0
Local average
0.59
0This provider
0.59Local average
Repeated topics
Topics that appeared in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. They may reveal a pattern worth examining.
No repeated topics found
The available reports do not show the same violation topic appearing in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. Review the inspection history below for one-time violations or report details.
Inspection history
Available inspection history. Select a violation topic for more info.
101238(a) The child care center shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times to ensure the safety and well-being of children, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on observation, LPA observed stacked furniture, 2 wooden pallets, push carts and storage bins with building materials on top, accessible gardening tools, a ladder, and large stacked boxes accessible to children in the outdoor activity space, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Inspector notes
Based on observation, LPA observed stacked furniture, 2 wooden pallets, push carts and storage bins with building materials on top, accessible gardening tools, a ladder, and large stacked boxes accessible to children in the outdoor activity space, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Admission Procedures and Parental and Authorized Representative's Rights: (2) Conduct one or more personal interviews with the child's parent or authorized representative that meets the following requirements: (B) Provides the child's parent or authorized representative with... procedures to be followed should the child become ill or injured while at the child care center, and procedures for conducting inspections for illness. This requirement was not met evidenced by, based on interviews and records reviewed parent was not notified of childs injury until the following week. This is a potential risk to the healthand safety of children in care.
Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision (a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary...(1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time... Supervision shall include visual ... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on video footage and interviews with staff, C1 was left unsupervised in the classroom B3 for approximately 4 minues, which posed a health and safety risk for children in care.
(b) Testing results with fractional ppb readings of 0.5 ppb or greater shall be rounded up...(1) A result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA Hamilton received the facilities water testing results for faucets with an Action Level Exceedance higher than the allowable limit.