At least one higher-concern violation appears in the last 12 months.
Next: Read reports, examine repeated topics below, look at the broader history, and ask what changed afterward.
Latest inspectionJuly 2, 2026
Latest inspection with no recorded violationsJuly 2, 2026
Summary
This summary covers 14 available inspections for THOMAS FAMILY CHILD CARE from August 2, 2021 through July 2, 2026.
Four inspections recorded violations, with four recorded violations in total.
The most recent higher-concern violation was on January 30, 2026 and involved child guidance, with a due date of February 2, 2026.
That higher-concern topic showed up in two inspections.
Three later inspections, from March 23, 2026 through July 2, 2026, showed no recorded violations, but the records do not say whether they were formal follow-ups.
At a glance
Total inspections
14
6 in last 12 months
Recorded violations
4
1 in last 12 months
Higher-concern violations
3
1 in last 12 months
Repeated topics
1
Last 36 months
Local comparison
14 total inspections vs 4 local median in 92394
Compared to 27 local facilities
Recorded violations per inspection
This provider
0.29
Local median
0
0.29This provider
0Local median
Inspections with higher-concern violations
This provider
21%
Local median
0%
21%This provider
0%Local median
Inspections with recorded violations
This provider
29%
Local median
0%
29%This provider
0%Local median
Repeated topics
This provider
1
Local average
0.11
1This provider
0.11Local average
Repeated topics
Topics that appeared in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. They may reveal a pattern worth examining.
Child guidance
Appeared across 2 inspections, with 2 recorded violations.
102423(a)(2) – Personal Rights(a) Each child receiving services from a family child care home shall be entitled... (2)To receive safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations... This requirement was not met by as evidenced by: the Department learned that on 11/03/25, Child #1 was in the living room with Child #2 when Child #1 attempted to pet the licensee’s dog. The dog reacted and scratched Child #1 on the right side of the face, leaving a diagonal scratch across the right cheek along with small red abrasions and a small puncture wound on the scalp near the hairline. This is a Type A violation that poses immediate threat to the health and safety of children in care
Report comments
This requirement was not met by as evidenced by: the Department learned that on 11/03/25, Child #1 was in the living room with Child #2 when Child #1 attempted to pet the licensee’s dog. The dog reacted and scratched Child #1 on the right side of the face, leaving a diagonal scratch across the right cheek along with small red abrasions and a small puncture wound on the scalp near the hairline. This is a Type A violation that poses immediate threat to the health and safety of children in care
(d) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1596.871 shall prior to working, residing, or volunteering in a licensed facility: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee allowed an adult who is not associated to the facilty be enter the facility or engage with child care children. This poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care
102423(a)(4)-(a)Each child receiving services...family child care home shall have...rights. rights include...(4) ... free from... unusual punishment, infliction of ...pain, humiliation, intimidation...threat, mental abuse...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on confidential interviews the allegation on Personal Rights proved Licensee hit Child 1 while in care. This poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risks to the persons in care.
Report comments
Based on confidential interviews the allegation on Personal Rights proved Licensee hit Child 1 while in care. This poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risks to the persons in care.
102417(8) Operation of a Family Child Care Home- Each family child care home shall have a current roster of children as specified in Health and Safety Code Section 1596.841.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and observation, LPA interviewed a child in day care that was not on the facility roster and according to Licensee, child had been in care since February. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risks to the persons in care. Licensee will provide proof by POC date of 8/18/2023.
Correction / follow-up note
Based on interview and observation, LPA interviewed a child in day care that was not on the facility roster and according to Licensee, child had been in care since February. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risks to the persons in care. Licensee will provide proof by POC date of 8/18/2023.