The available records raise questions worth asking before enrolling.
Next: Review the inspection history below and ask the provider what the records mean and what changed afterward.
Latest inspectionSeptember 16, 2025
Latest inspection with no recorded violationsSeptember 16, 2025
Summary
This summary covers nine available inspections for CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTER from August 18, 2021 through September 16, 2025.
Three inspections recorded violations, with six recorded violations in total.
The most recent higher-concern violation was on August 22, 2024 and involved staff-to-child ratio, with a due date of August 29, 2024.
A later inspection showed no recorded violations, but the records do not say whether it was a formal follow-up.
At a glance
Total inspections
9
1 in last 12 months
Recorded violations
6
0 in last 12 months
Higher-concern violations
2
0 in last 12 months
Repeated topics
0
Last 36 months
Local comparison
9 total inspections vs 3 local median in 92821
Compared to 23 local facilities
Recorded violations per inspection
This provider
0.67
Local median
0.25
0.67This provider
0.25Local median
Inspections with higher-concern violations
This provider
22%
Local median
0%
22%This provider
0%Local median
Inspections with recorded violations
This provider
33%
Local median
25%
33%This provider
25%Local median
Repeated topics
This provider
0
Local average
0.04
0This provider
0.04Local average
Repeated topics
Topics that appeared in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. They may reveal a pattern worth examining.
No repeated topics found
The available reports do not show the same violation topic appearing in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. Review the inspection history below for one-time violations or report details.
Inspection history
Available inspection history. Select a violation topic for more info.
Section 101416.5 Staff-Infant Ratio (b) There shall be a ratio of one teacher for every four infants in attendance. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, on 8/22/24 at 8:34am Room 3 had a ratio of 15 infants and 3 staff. This is an immediate risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care.
101226.1 Daily Inspection for Illness (a) The licensee shall be responsible for ensuring that children with obvious symptoms of illness including, but not limited to, fever or vomiting, are not accepted. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, on 7/12/24, LPA received report of an infant vomiting on 7/11/24 at approximately 3:00pm. Based on review of sign in and sign out sheets, the infant returned to the facility on 7/12/24 at 9:26am. This is an immediate health and safety risk to the children in care.
Report comments
Based on interviews and record review, on 7/12/24, LPA received report of an infant vomiting on 7/11/24 at approximately 3:00pm. Based on review of sign in and sign out sheets, the infant returned to the facility on 7/12/24 at 9:26am. This is an immediate health and safety risk to the children in care.
Correction status
Plan of correction due by August 7, 2024
More details
Official CA class
Type A deficiency
Report section
CCR 101226.1(a) - 101226.1(a)
Official code
101226.1(a)
Low concern: Recordkeeping
Report finding
101426.2 Infant Care Isolation for Illness (b) The isolation area shall be equipped with a crib, cot, mat or playpen for each ill infant. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, facility did not isolate infants showing signs of illness to an isolation area during the HFM outbreak between 6/3/24-7/30/24. This is an immediate health and safety risk to the children in care.
Report comments
Based on interviews and record review, facility did not isolate infants showing signs of illness to an isolation area during the HFM outbreak between 6/3/24-7/30/24. This is an immediate health and safety risk to the children in care.
Correction status
Plan of correction due by August 7, 2024
More details
Official CA class
Type A deficiency
Report section
CCR 101426.2(b) - 101426.2(b)
Official code
101426.2(b)
Medium concern: Incident records
Report finding
101212 Reporting Requirements (c) ...During the operation of the child care center... a report shall be made to the Department by... next working day...In addition, a written report containing the information specified...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, Facility did not report the HFM outbreak which began 6/3/24 to the Department in a timely manner. Facility reported the HFM outbreak during the 10-day initial visit on 7/3/24. This is a potential health and safety risk to the children in care.
Report comments
Based on interviews and record review, Facility did not report the HFM outbreak which began 6/3/24 to the Department in a timely manner. Facility reported the HFM outbreak during the 10-day initial visit on 7/3/24. This is a potential health and safety risk to the children in care.
Correction status
Plan of correction due by August 7, 2024
More details
Official CA class
Type B deficiency
Report section
CCR 101212(c) - 101212(c)
Official code
101212(c)
Low concern: Recordkeeping
Report finding
101218.1 Admission Procedures and Parental and Authorized Representative's Rights (a) In accordance with the child care center's....(2) procedures, activities, services...(B) procedures...should the child become ill...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not follow admission protocol by accepting children with illness and not utilizing an isolation area during the HFM outbreak between 6/3/24-7/30/24. This is a potential health and safety risk to the children in care.
Report comments
Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not follow admission protocol by accepting children with illness and not utilizing an isolation area during the HFM outbreak between 6/3/24-7/30/24. This is a potential health and safety risk to the children in care.
101700.3 California Lead Action Level at Child Care Centers (b) Testing results with fractional ppb readings of 0.5 ppb or greater shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number, before comparing to the Action Level. (1) A result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. The above was not met as evidenced by: The facility registered a single faucet in the facility with lead levels exceeding 5.5ppb.
Report comments
The above was not met as evidenced by: The facility registered a single faucet in the facility with lead levels exceeding 5.5ppb.