The available records raise questions worth asking before enrolling.
Next: Review the inspection history below and ask the provider what the records mean and what changed afterward.
Latest inspectionFebruary 12, 2026
Latest inspection with no recorded violationsFebruary 12, 2026
Summary
This summary covers seven available inspections for FAMILY OF PRAYER & PRAISE/FRUIT OF THE VINE from November 3, 2023 through February 12, 2026.
Two inspections recorded violations, with three recorded violations in total.
The most recent recorded violation was on January 15, 2026 and involved equipment or readiness, with a due date of January 23, 2026.
DaycareFacts did not classify any of these violations at the Higher concern level.
Two later inspections, from January 23, 2026 through February 12, 2026, showed no recorded violations, but the records do not say whether they were formal follow-ups.
At a glance
Total inspections
7
3 in last 12 months
Recorded violations
3
2 in last 12 months
Higher-concern violations
0
0 in last 12 months
Repeated topics
0
Last 36 months
Local comparison
7 total inspections vs 4 local median in 90061
Compared to 22 local facilities
Recorded violations per inspection
This provider
0.43
Local median
0.5
0.43This provider
0.5Local median
Inspections with higher-concern violations
This provider
0%
Local median
3%
0%This provider
3%Local median
Inspections with recorded violations
This provider
29%
Local median
33%
29%This provider
33%Local median
Repeated topics
This provider
0
Local average
0.45
0This provider
0.45Local average
Repeated topics
Topics that appeared in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. They may reveal a pattern worth examining.
No repeated topics found
The available reports do not show the same violation topic appearing in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. Review the inspection history below for one-time violations or report details.
Inspection history
Available inspection history. Select a violation topic for more info.
Licensure Requirements Every licensed child day care center shall have one or more carbon monoxide detectors in the facility that meet the standards established in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 13260) of Part 2 of Division 12. The department shall account for the presence of these detectors during inspections. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on phone call via Telephonically with CFO/ Administrator Donna Cunningham at 11:21am stated she called the company of the Fire System and stated Carbon monoxide is not installed and they can provide a stand alone device, in the preschool building no carbon monoxide was observed by LPA Calderon and G.Doroteo, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [1] out of [1] device which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Correction status
Plan of correction due by January 23, 2026
More details
Official CA class
Type B deficiency
Report section
HSC 1596.954 - 1596.954
Official code
1596.954
Medium concern: Facility condition
Report finding
Drinking Water (a) Drinking water from a noncontaminating fixture or container shall be readily available both indoors and in the outdoor activity area. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on during outdoor play for classroom #2 at approx. 9:30am, LPA Calderon alongside G.Doroteo observed, no water jug or water bottles for children playing outside, water was not readily available, deficiency cited. Shortly, after Director G.Doroteo informed Lead Teacher to get water for children, LPA observed water being filled up in a jug and cups were brought to children who were playing outside, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [1] out of [1] readily avaible water for children during outdoor play which posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
101700.3(b)(1) (b) Testing results with fractional ppb readings of 0.5 ppb or greater shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number, before comparing to the Action Level. (1) A result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Per phone call with Paul Lee at Water Testing Culligan Company stated testing less than 15.000 ug/L and did not test for lead results less than 5.5ppb. Results not inputted on State Water Board and No sketch provided indicating water source tested. Dept. Written Directive was not followed.
Report comments
This requirement was not met as evidence by: Per phone call with Paul Lee at Water Testing Culligan Company stated testing less than 15.000 ug/L and did not test for lead results less than 5.5ppb. Results not inputted on State Water Board and No sketch provided indicating water source tested. Dept. Written Directive was not followed.