Recorded violations per inspection
- This provider
- 0.44
- Local median
- 0
MAGANA CASTILLO, RAQUEL
Richmond, CA 94805
- Facility:
- 073409271
- Type:
- FAMILY DAY CARE HOME
- Status:
- Licensed
- Records checked:
- July 17, 2026
Additional info
- Source:
- California Community Care Licensing Division
- District office:
- Not listed
- License effective:
- Not found
- Capacity:
- 14
Inspection snapshot
Recent higher-concern violation
At least one higher-concern violation appears in the last 12 months.
Next: Read reports, examine repeated topics below, look at the broader history, and ask what changed afterward.
Latest inspectionJune 16, 2026
Latest inspection with no recorded violationsJune 16, 2026
Summary
This summary covers nine available inspections for MAGANA CASTILLO, RAQUEL from May 16, 2022 through June 16, 2026.
Three inspections recorded violations, with four recorded violations in total.
The most recent higher-concern violation was on June 5, 2026 and involved sleep safety, with a due date of June 12, 2026.
Staff-to-child ratio was a higher-concern topic that showed up in three inspections.
Two later inspections on June 16, 2026 showed no recorded violations, but the records do not say whether they were formal follow-ups.
At a glance
- Total inspections
- 9
- Recorded violations
- 4
- Higher-concern violations
- 3
- Repeated topics
- 1
3 in last 12 months
2 in last 12 months
2 in last 12 months
Last 36 months
Local comparison
9 total inspections vs 2 local median in 94805
Compared to 8 local facilities
Inspections with higher-concern violations
- This provider
- 22%
- Local median
- 0%
Inspections with recorded violations
- This provider
- 33%
- Local median
- 0%
Repeated topics
- This provider
- 1
- Local average
- 0.13
Repeated topics
Topics that appeared in more than one inspection during the last 36 months. They may reveal a pattern worth examining.
Staff-to-child ratio
Appeared across 3 inspections, with 3 recorded violations.
October 13, 2023May 20, 2025June 5, 2026Inspection history
Available inspection history. Select a violation topic for more info.
No recorded violations in this report
No recorded violations in this report
Higher concern: Sleep safety
- Report finding
- Infant Safe Sleep If an infant falls asleep before being placed in a crib or play yard, the provider shall move the infant to a crib or play yard as soon as possible. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when LPA's conducted a health and safety tour of the home and observed an infant sleeping in a bouncer like rocker which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- Correction status
- Plan of correction due by June 12, 2026
More details
- Official CA class
- Type B deficiency
- Report section
- CCR 102425(i) - 102425(i)
- Official code
- 102425(i)
Higher concern: Staff-to-child ratio
- Report finding
- Staffing Ratio and Capacity (d) For a Large Family Child Care Home, the maximum number of children for whom care may be provided at any one time when there is an assistant provider in the home, including children under age 10 who reside at the licensee's home and the assistant provider's children under age 10, shall be either: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when LPA's arrived to the facility and observed 21 children in care which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- Correction status
- Plan of correction due by June 12, 2026
More details
- Official CA class
- Type B deficiency
- Report section
- CCR 102416.5(d) - 102416.5(d)
- Official code
- 102416.5(d)
No recorded violations in this report
Medium concern: Staff-to-child ratio
- Report finding
- For a Large Family Child Care Home, the maximum number of children for whom care may be provided at any one time when there is an assistant provider in the home shall be .... More than twelve and up to fourteen children. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when LPA observed photos of 16 children in care by Licensee which poses an immediate risk to the health, safety or personal rights of children in care.
- Correction status
- Plan of correction due by June 6, 2025
More details
- Official CA class
- Type B deficiency
- Report section
- CCR 102416.5(d)(2) - 102416.5(d)(2)
- Official code
- 102416.5(d)(2)
No recorded violations in this report
Higher concern: Staff-to-child ratio
- Report finding
- 102416.5 Staffing Ratio and Capacity(d) For a Large Family Child Care Home, the maximum number of children for whom care may be provided at any one time when there is an assistant provider in the home...shall be either: (1) Twelve children, no more than four of whom may be infants.. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Licensee was supervising and caring for 5 infants which poses an potential risk to the health, safety or personal rights of children in care.
- Report comments
- This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Licensee was supervising and caring for 5 infants which poses an potential risk to the health, safety or personal rights of children in care.
- Correction status
- Plan of correction due by October 17, 2023
More details
- Official CA class
- Type B deficiency
- Report section
- CCR 102416.5(d)(1) - 102416.5(d)(1)
- Official code
- 102416.5(d)(1)
No recorded violations in this report
No recorded violations in this report